home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: EU.net!sun4nl!uw03!hp01!not-for-mail
- From: rjn@pobox.com (Fidelio)
- Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.crackers,alt.cracks,alt.religion.scientology,alt.cyberspace,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,alt.games.duke3d,alt.flame,alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.descent,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.bigfoot
- Subject: Re: NT or 95?
- Date: 10 Apr 1996 10:50:06 +0200
- Organization: Redwood Nederland B.V.
- Sender: rob@redwood.nl
- Message-ID: <4kfsnu$7s3@hp01.redwood.nl>
- References: <3161C78E.478D@hydro.on.ca> <4kc4lk$m8@news.wco.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hp01.redwood.nl
-
- LewM@PacX.Com (Lewis Mettler) writes:
-
- >Lisa Wang <lisa.wang@hydro.on.ca> wrote:
-
- >If you want to go slow use NT.
-
- >If you want unreliable operation use 95.
-
- >If you rather go fast and be reliable you will have to use OS/2.
-
- Fast and reliable, that sounds like Linux to me. Going fast until it
- suddenly crashes, with no applications to run, not supporting the most
- common hardware, that's OS/2.
-
- R
- --
- ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
- Rob J. Nauta Linux: putting power in the wrong hands
- rjn@pobox.com
-